{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","ns0":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/"},"@id":"obo_purl:RO_0002163","@type":"owl:ObjectProperty","rdfs:label":"spatially disjoint from","obo_purl:IAO_0000115":"A is spatially_disjoint_from B if and only if they have no parts in common","obo_purl:IAO_0000117":{"@language":"en","@value":"Chris Mungall"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000114":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_0000125"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000116":{"@language":"en","@value":"There are two ways to encode this as a shortcut relation. The other possibility to use an annotation assertion between two classes, and expand this to a disjointness axiom. "},"obo_purl:IAO_0000119":{"@id":"ns0:22293552"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000232":"Note that it would be possible to use the relation to label the relationship between a near infinite number of structures - between the rings of saturn and my left earlobe. The intent is that this is used for parsiomoniously for disambiguation purposes - for example, between siblings in a jointly exhaustive pairwise disjointness hierarchy","obo_purl:RO_0001900":{"@id":"obo_purl:RO_0001901"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000424":"BFO_0000051 exactly 0 (BFO_0000050 some ?Y)"}