{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","ns0":"https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/wiki/","ns1":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/","oboinowl_gen":"http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#"},"@graph":[{"@id":"obo_purl:RO_0002160","@type":"owl:ObjectProperty","rdfs:label":["only in taxon","only_in_taxon"],"rdfs:seeAlso":{"@id":"ns0:Taxon-constraints"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000115":"x only in taxon y if and only if x is in taxon y, and there is no other organism z such that y!=z a and x is in taxon z.","obo_purl:IAO_0000117":{"@language":"en","@value":"Chris Mungall"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000112":"lactation SubClassOf 'only in taxon' some 'Mammalia'","obo_purl:IAO_0000114":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_0000125"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000116":"The original intent was to treat this as a macro that expands to 'in taxon' only ?Y - however, this is not necessary if we instead have supplemental axioms that state that each pair of sibling tax have a disjointness axiom using the 'in taxon' property - e.g.\n\n 'in taxon' some Eukaryota DisjointWith 'in taxon' some Eubacteria","obo_purl:IAO_0000119":[{"@id":"ns1:20973947"},{"@id":"ns1:17921072"}],"oboinowl_gen:id":"only_in_taxon"},{"@id":"obo_purl:FOODON_00001303","obo_purl:IAO_0100001":{"@id":"obo_purl:RO_0002160"}}]}