<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:obo_purl="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:ns0="http://orcid.org/">
<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMO_0001002">
<rdfs:label>domain entity does not exist</rdfs:label>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000115 xml:lang="en">The term was added to the ontology on the assumption it was a valid domain entity, but it turns out the entity does not exist in reality.</obo_purl:IAO_0000115>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000117 rdf:resource="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153"/>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000116 xml:lang="en">This obsolesence reason should be used conservatively. For example: Obsoleting class that describes a breed of cow based on a record in an existing database, that was later retracted as faulty (breed does not exist). Do not use this term to obsolete a historic concept (that was once valid, but not anymore). </obo_purl:IAO_0000116>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000233>https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/136</obo_purl:IAO_0000233>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000234>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153</obo_purl:IAO_0000234>
</owl:NamedIndividual>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:obo_purl="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:ns0="http://orcid.org/">
<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMO_0001002">
<rdfs:label>domain entity does not exist</rdfs:label>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000115 xml:lang="en">The term was added to the ontology on the assumption it was a valid domain entity, but it turns out the entity does not exist in reality.</obo_purl:IAO_0000115>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000117 rdf:resource="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153"/>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000116 xml:lang="en">This obsolesence reason should be used conservatively. For example: Obsoleting class that describes a breed of cow based on a record in an existing database, that was later retracted as faulty (breed does not exist). Do not use this term to obsolete a historic concept (that was once valid, but not anymore). </obo_purl:IAO_0000116>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000233>https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/136</obo_purl:IAO_0000233>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000234>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153</obo_purl:IAO_0000234>
</owl:NamedIndividual>
</rdf:RDF>