<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:obo_purl="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:oboinowl_gen="http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#" xmlns:metadata_def="http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/">
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000466"/>
<rdfs:label>bona-fide anatomical boundary</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:comment>One might argue that all boundaries are actually fiat in the sense that there must be some fiat element at a fine enough scale of granularity. This ontology choses to ignore this issue as below the level of granularity relevant to anatomy. (DOS121102)</rdfs:comment>
<skos:notation>UBERON:0010199</skos:notation>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000115>An anatomical boundary that corresponds to some physical discontinuity.</obo_purl:IAO_0000115>
<oboinowl_gen:hasDbXref>CARO:0001004</oboinowl_gen:hasDbXref>
<oboinowl_gen:hasOBONamespace>uberon</oboinowl_gen:hasOBONamespace>
<oboinowl_gen:id>UBERON:0010199</oboinowl_gen:id>
<oboinowl_gen:inSubset rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#upper_level"/>
<metadata_def:prefLabel>bona-fide anatomical boundary</metadata_def:prefLabel>
<metadata_def:mappingLoom>bonafideanatomicalboundary</metadata_def:mappingLoom>
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199"/>
</owl:Class>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0006984">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199">
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:obo_purl="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:oboinowl_gen="http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#" xmlns:metadata_def="http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/">
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000466"/>
<rdfs:label>bona-fide anatomical boundary</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:comment>One might argue that all boundaries are actually fiat in the sense that there must be some fiat element at a fine enough scale of granularity. This ontology choses to ignore this issue as below the level of granularity relevant to anatomy. (DOS121102)</rdfs:comment>
<skos:notation>UBERON:0010199</skos:notation>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000115>An anatomical boundary that corresponds to some physical discontinuity.</obo_purl:IAO_0000115>
<oboinowl_gen:hasDbXref>CARO:0001004</oboinowl_gen:hasDbXref>
<oboinowl_gen:hasOBONamespace>uberon</oboinowl_gen:hasOBONamespace>
<oboinowl_gen:id>UBERON:0010199</oboinowl_gen:id>
<oboinowl_gen:inSubset rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#upper_level"/>
<metadata_def:prefLabel>bona-fide anatomical boundary</metadata_def:prefLabel>
<metadata_def:mappingLoom>bonafideanatomicalboundary</metadata_def:mappingLoom>
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199"/>
</owl:Class>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0006984">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199">
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0010199"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>