{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","oboinowl_gen":"http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#","ns0":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#","metadata_def":"http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/"},"@graph":[{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0010199","@type":"owl:Class","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0000466"},"rdfs:label":"bona-fide anatomical boundary","rdfs:comment":"One might argue that all boundaries are actually fiat in the sense that there must be some fiat element at a fine enough scale of granularity. This ontology choses to ignore this issue as below the level of granularity relevant to anatomy. (DOS121102)","skos:notation":"UBERON:0010199","obo_purl:IAO_0000115":"An anatomical boundary that corresponds to some physical discontinuity.","oboinowl_gen:hasDbXref":"CARO:0001004","oboinowl_gen:hasOBONamespace":"uberon","oboinowl_gen:id":"UBERON:0010199","oboinowl_gen:inSubset":{"@id":"ns0:upper_level"},"metadata_def:prefLabel":"bona-fide anatomical boundary","metadata_def:mappingLoom":"bonafideanatomicalboundary","metadata_def:mappingSameURI":{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0010199"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0006984","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0010199"}}]}
{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","oboinowl_gen":"http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#","ns0":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#","metadata_def":"http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/"},"@graph":[{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0010199","@type":"owl:Class","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0000466"},"rdfs:label":"bona-fide anatomical boundary","rdfs:comment":"One might argue that all boundaries are actually fiat in the sense that there must be some fiat element at a fine enough scale of granularity. This ontology choses to ignore this issue as below the level of granularity relevant to anatomy. (DOS121102)","skos:notation":"UBERON:0010199","obo_purl:IAO_0000115":"An anatomical boundary that corresponds to some physical discontinuity.","oboinowl_gen:hasDbXref":"CARO:0001004","oboinowl_gen:hasOBONamespace":"uberon","oboinowl_gen:id":"UBERON:0010199","oboinowl_gen:inSubset":{"@id":"ns0:upper_level"},"metadata_def:prefLabel":"bona-fide anatomical boundary","metadata_def:mappingLoom":"bonafideanatomicalboundary","metadata_def:mappingSameURI":{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0010199"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0006984","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:UBERON_0010199"}}]}