<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:obo_purl="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMO_0001000">
<rdfs:label>out of scope</rdfs:label>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000115 xml:lang="en">The term was added to the ontology on the assumption it was in scope, but it turned out later that it was not.</obo_purl:IAO_0000115>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000116 xml:lang="en">This obsolesence reason should be used conservatively. Typical valid examples are: un-necessary grouping classes in disease ontologies, a phenotype term added on the assumption it was a disease.</obo_purl:IAO_0000116>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000233>https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/77</obo_purl:IAO_0000233>
</owl:NamedIndividual>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:obo_purl="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMO_0001000">
<rdfs:label>out of scope</rdfs:label>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000115 xml:lang="en">The term was added to the ontology on the assumption it was in scope, but it turned out later that it was not.</obo_purl:IAO_0000115>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000116 xml:lang="en">This obsolesence reason should be used conservatively. Typical valid examples are: un-necessary grouping classes in disease ontologies, a phenotype term added on the assumption it was a disease.</obo_purl:IAO_0000116>
<obo_purl:IAO_0000233>https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/77</obo_purl:IAO_0000233>
</owl:NamedIndividual>
</rdf:RDF>