{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"},"@id":"obo_purl:OMO_0001000","@type":"owl:NamedIndividual","rdfs:label":"out of scope","obo_purl:IAO_0000115":{"@language":"en","@value":"The term was added to the ontology on the assumption it was in scope, but it turned out later that it was not."},"obo_purl:IAO_0000116":{"@language":"en","@value":"This obsolesence reason should be used conservatively. Typical valid examples are: un-necessary grouping classes in disease ontologies, a phenotype term added on the assumption it was a disease."},"obo_purl:IAO_0000233":"https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/77"}