{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"},"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_0000410","@type":"owl:NamedIndividual","rdfs:label":{"@value":"universal","@language":"en"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000116":{"@value":"Hard to give a definition for. Intuitively a \"natural kind\" rather than a collection of any old things, which a class is able to be, formally. At the meta level, universals are defined as positives, are disjoint with their siblings, have single asserted parents.","@language":"en"}}
{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"},"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_0000410","@type":"owl:NamedIndividual","rdfs:label":{"@value":"universal","@language":"en"},"obo_purl:IAO_0000116":{"@value":"Hard to give a definition for. Intuitively a \"natural kind\" rather than a collection of any old things, which a class is able to be, formally. At the meta level, universals are defined as positives, are disjoint with their siblings, have single asserted parents.","@language":"en"}}