{"@context":{"obo_purl":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","oboinowl_gen":"http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#","metadata_def":"http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/","metadata":"http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/"},"@graph":[{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000","@type":"owl:Class","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_0000102"},"rdfs:label":"ontology module","obo_purl:IAO_0000116":"I have placed this under 'data about an ontology part', but this can be discussed. I think this is OK if 'part' is interpreted reflexively, as an ontology module is the whole ontology rather than part of it.","obo_purl:IAO_0000118":"ontology file","oboinowl_gen:created_by":"cjm","oboinowl_gen:creation_date":{"@type":"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime","@value":"2018-05-20T20:55:03Z"},"metadata:def/prefLabel":"ontology module","metadata:def/mappingLoom":"ontologymodule","metadata:def/mappingSameURI":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"},"metadata:prefixIRI":"IAO:8000000","obo_purl:IAO_0000232":"This class and it's subclasses are applied to OWL ontologies. Using an rdf:type triple will result in problems with OWL-DL. I propose that dcterms:type is instead used to connect an ontology URI with a class from this hierarchy. The class hierarchy is not disjoint, so multiple assertions can be made about a single ontology."},{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000001","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000002","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000003","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000004","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000006","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000013","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"}},{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000014","rdfs:subClassOf":{"@id":"obo_purl:IAO_8000000"}}]}