<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ns0="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:metadata_def="http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/" xmlns:metadata="http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/">
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Crop_management_technology"/>
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage"/>
<metadata_def:mappingLoom>conservationtillage</metadata_def:mappingLoom>
<metadata_def:prefLabel>Conservation_tillage</metadata_def:prefLabel>
<rdfs:comment>Conservation tillage leaves at least 30% of crop residue on the soil surface, or at least 1,000 lb/ac (1,100 kg/ha) of small grain residue on the surface during the critical soil erosion period. This slows water movement, which reduces the amount of soil erosion. Conservation tillage also benefits farmers by reducing fuel consumption and soil compaction. By reducing the number of times the farmer travels over the field, farmers realize significant savings in fuel and labor. In most years since 1997, conservation tillage was used in US cropland more than intensive or reduced tillage</rdfs:comment>
<metadata:prefixIRI>AT:Conservation_tillage</metadata:prefixIRI>
</owl:Class>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/No-till">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage">
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Strip-Till">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ns0="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:metadata_def="http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/" xmlns:metadata="http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/">
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Crop_management_technology"/>
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage"/>
<metadata_def:mappingLoom>conservationtillage</metadata_def:mappingLoom>
<metadata_def:prefLabel>Conservation_tillage</metadata_def:prefLabel>
<rdfs:comment>Conservation tillage leaves at least 30% of crop residue on the soil surface, or at least 1,000 lb/ac (1,100 kg/ha) of small grain residue on the surface during the critical soil erosion period. This slows water movement, which reduces the amount of soil erosion. Conservation tillage also benefits farmers by reducing fuel consumption and soil compaction. By reducing the number of times the farmer travels over the field, farmers realize significant savings in fuel and labor. In most years since 1997, conservation tillage was used in US cropland more than intensive or reduced tillage</rdfs:comment>
<metadata:prefixIRI>AT:Conservation_tillage</metadata:prefixIRI>
</owl:Class>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/No-till">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage">
<metadata_def:mappingSameURI rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Strip-Till">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://data.ifpri.org/lod/at/resource/Conservation_tillage"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>